t has been five years since the first season of the Indian Premier League, not a long time for a league to change the face of a game which has centuries-old history. But being the first of its kind the league has made it possible for us to conceive possibilities that would have otherwise eluded cricket fans.
I have spent my whole childhood forming up dream elevens in my mind, team that would take into its fold Lara, Tendulkar, Jaysurya, Warne, Donald and all. But I knew it wouldn’t happen. My sole glimpse of utopia came once in many seasons when ICC would pity and schedule matches for World XI. But even then the 11 of their choice wouldn’t satisfy. Such elevens were calculated after much study, perfectly ascertaining the team composition — good for the game? Maybe — but it was too plain for a fan’s fancy.
Lalit Modi’s formula, and before that the short-lived Indian Cricket League, brought an end to such distaste. We could have players as many as we wanted, and from whatever countries we wanted them to be. We thought cricket finally had its answer for the football leagues we see abroad. There were added benefits that IPL brought for the young Indian players: better pay and better exposure both on and off the field. Without the IPL it wouldn’t have been possible for a Kamran Khan to be nurtured by Shane Warne. Without IPL Subramaniam Badrinath could not have received tips on sustenance from someone like Michael Hussey.
But these gains just came by, they weren’t really planned. And the league now in its fifth year, with dwindling television ratings, mindless organising and repeated charges of nepotism on it, makes evident that it was only a red-herring to attain individualistic goals.
One might argue that no businessman plans his venture without keeping in mind his personal gains, that service to society always ranks much lower in his radar. But if that is so, Modi the man in question has already been booted out, now the league caters to whose gains?
Wardrobe malfunction happens when a person fails to carry his/her attire with usual élan. Just when we thought no one can boast of being both hip and eccentric like Lady Gaga, BCCI president N. Srinivasan proved that we were counting him out. He wears two hats at the same and that we don’t notice or that we forget shows how easefully he does it. The president’s son-in-law owns India Cements that is the owner of Chennai Super Kings. But even then he denies there’s any clash of interest and we happily accept that there isn’t any.
he Indian Premier League is cricket in more than one ways and yet it fails to be. Veteran journalist MJ Akbar in his column for The Sunday Guardian writes, “If IPL was only about cricket, it would have been a pallid addition to the genre, and not that original either.” This very fact made it lively for the first few seasons. Its share of cheerleaders, Page3 presence and over-the-top commentary did excite like a new relationship but it failed to marry cricket and fans at the same time.
International cricketers have time and again preferred the money-minting league over their nation which hasn’t gone down well with administrators of some boards but who cares. Chris Gayle hasn’t played a Test match since almost 18 months and just it seemed there was some hope of negotiation with the WICB his IPL commitment ensured that his country has to wait.
Gayle has his reasons and he has played fair amount of international cricket by now, what concerns is the growing tendency among youngsters to do so. Off-spinner Sunil Narine’s absence from the West Indies Test team — after his mesmerising performance against Australia in the ODIs — has been downplayed by the team management, but voices say it was lucre that drove the teenager some 14,000 km away from national duty.
The Indian leg-spinner Piyush Chawla, who shot to fame in early teenage after dismissing Tendulkar in a Challenger Trophy game, couldn’t live up to the expectations and faltered away from the international scene. He did make a surprise comeback last year when he was named in the World Cup squad, but is yet to convince the selectors that he is better than his contemporaries.
Chawla represents Kings XI Punjab in the IPL and plays for Sussex in the English County competition. At the age of 23 when a player usually focuses on polishing the blunt areas of his game, it looks like Chawla is content with what he has. During his stint with Sussex, he once enthusiastically told a journalist, “People might have forgotten me as I don’t play for India anymore, but I’m happy to represent Sussex.”
It isn’t IPL alone that’s killing the game. But it is contributing largely to cricket’s demise. County cricket has been there since the time cricket was born, but it had an understated existence. Unlike the IPL, its organised structure helped cricketers improve. Most importantly it never promoted the club cricket as an alternative to internationals.
Things are only getting worse. In a survey done by Federation of International Cricketers’ Associations (FICA), around one-third of the cricketers said they would consider taking early retirement to play in lucrative leagues like the IPL. Around 40 percent said, they can think of a day not far away when cricketers would prefer T20 leagues over Test cricket. Unless proper remedial measures are taken now, cricket’s doomsday is round the corner.
4 Comments
-
Venkat Raman Joined 0 pointsThese statements are absolute Nonsense…
Subramanium Badrinath has played loads and loads of county cricket…not to compare with the likes of Kamran Khan…Even if Hussey was not in the team badri would have received tips from Dhoni and why not, even from the coaches and would have a gained tons of experience in addition to his county cricket’s…commented on 2nd May 2012 at 8:56 pm -
Suresh Shamanna Joined 0 pointsPLAYERS COME AND GO BUT THE GAME REMAINS FOR EVER….
commented on 30th Apr 2012 at 2:29 pm -
Tanay Ghosh Joined 0 pointsYour article is compelling, but belongs to the same ‘IPL is bad for the game’ argument I have been countering for what seems like eternity. If two formats of the game (T20/Tests) and Domestic/International competitions cannot fruitfully co-exist, it is not the IPL’s fault but squarely that of the ICC. Every cricket fan knows the severe limitations of Test Cricket as a tool to take the game forward (AND mind you, global!) and if the ICC cannot carve a dedicated window for a league that is the sport’s best bet to gain global popularity (and frankly, to get more fans to just care about it), it is not anyone else’s fault but the ICC’s own.
And the IPL isn’t getting a dedicated window because of what? The ICC’s extremely futile Future Tours Programme (FTP) where countries go to endless bilateral tours where no tour has a bearing on the next (they play for the ICC Rankings you say? Now that’s a poor excuse for a league table!).
As fans of the cricket, it is time ‘purists’ of the game recognize that T20 and the IPL are an asset to the sport (and the sport’s best bet to make it a bonafide WORLD sport!) and that the sport’s future lies in a system where countries fight it out in all 3 formats culminating in ONE SINGLE CHAMPIONSHIP. And yes, with the IPL thriving side by side!
commented on 30th Apr 2012 at 2:12 pm

I agree with the writer of this article.. IPL is too strecthd, bsides it z also a source raging the club vs country debates.. n tests r still the best.. each game has its ethics.. u cant cut off chess timings for entertainment values.. on any day I’d prefer an Ashes series over a t20 tournament!