"Return the World Cup" - Twitterati slams Stuart Broad for calling MCC law change 'unfair'

Fans, journalists and members of the cricket fraternity on Twitter weren't too impressed with England pacer Stuart Broad's opinion on the latest changes in the run-out laws.Running out a non-striker before delivering the ball, also known as 'Mankading', used to be considered 'unfair play' by the Marylebone Cricket Club (MCC)'s laws. On Wednesday, the MCC brought it under the ambit of its law 38 which governs normal run-outs. The rules will apply from October 1.Reacting to the change, Broad took to his Twitter account to say that he feels it's 'unfair' because dismissing a batter requires skills while such run-outs don't. The tweet immediately invited a deluge of comments and retweets. Although some fans agreed with the 35-year-old Englishman's opinion, most disagreed.Some countered him on the 'skill' logic. Some brought up the infamous incident from the 2013 Ashes when Broad didn't walk after clearly nicking the ball to slips. A few slammed him for using the word 'Mankad' - derived from Vinoo Mankad, one of India's greatest all-rounders. Others brought up England's 2019 World Cup win.The following are some of the best of the reactions to Broad's tweet:WV Raman@wvramanIt is not about skill, but getting punished for a crime. Of course, on a cricket field, it is about disregarding the laws of the game.. A traffic cop doesn't display skill when he books someone for jumping a traffic signal!! @StuartBroad88:10 AM · Mar 9, 202266054It is not about skill, but getting punished for a crime. Of course, on a cricket field, it is about disregarding the laws of the game.. A traffic cop doesn't display skill when he books someone for jumping a traffic signal!! @StuartBroad8raghav@ragav94Does that mean every mode of dismissal against English test side unfair ? You don’t really need much skills to do that twitter.com/stuartbroad8/s…Stuart Broad@StuartBroad8So the Mankad is no longer unfair &amp; is now a legitimate dismissal. Hasn’t it always been a legitimate dismissal &amp; whether it is unfair is subjective? I think it is unfair &amp; wouldn’t consider it, as IMO, dismissing a batter is about skill &amp; the Mankad requires zero skill. twitter.com/skycricket/sta…5:09 AM · Mar 9, 202232966So the Mankad is no longer unfair &amp; is now a legitimate dismissal. Hasn’t it always been a legitimate dismissal &amp; whether it is unfair is subjective? I think it is unfair &amp; wouldn’t consider it, as IMO, dismissing a batter is about skill &amp; the Mankad requires zero skill. twitter.com/skycricket/sta…Does that mean every mode of dismissal against English test side unfair ? You don’t really need much skills to do that twitter.com/stuartbroad8/s…Yash@TheJoshyaStumping on a wide is literally rewarding the bowler being bad at his skill. twitter.com/StuartBroad8/s…Stuart Broad@StuartBroad8So the Mankad is no longer unfair &amp; is now a legitimate dismissal. Hasn’t it always been a legitimate dismissal &amp; whether it is unfair is subjective? I think it is unfair &amp; wouldn’t consider it, as IMO, dismissing a batter is about skill &amp; the Mankad requires zero skill. twitter.com/skycricket/sta…5:44 AM · Mar 9, 202261So the Mankad is no longer unfair &amp; is now a legitimate dismissal. Hasn’t it always been a legitimate dismissal &amp; whether it is unfair is subjective? I think it is unfair &amp; wouldn’t consider it, as IMO, dismissing a batter is about skill &amp; the Mankad requires zero skill. twitter.com/skycricket/sta…Stumping on a wide is literally rewarding the bowler being bad at his skill. twitter.com/StuartBroad8/s…Kaushik@_CricKaushik_Stuart Broad wants to say that running early even before the bowler bowls is a skill and he loves it. twitter.com/StuartBroad8/s…Stuart Broad@StuartBroad8So the Mankad is no longer unfair &amp; is now a legitimate dismissal. Hasn’t it always been a legitimate dismissal &amp; whether it is unfair is subjective? I think it is unfair &amp; wouldn’t consider it, as IMO, dismissing a batter is about skill &amp; the Mankad requires zero skill. twitter.com/skycricket/sta…5:37 AM · Mar 9, 2022122So the Mankad is no longer unfair &amp; is now a legitimate dismissal. Hasn’t it always been a legitimate dismissal &amp; whether it is unfair is subjective? I think it is unfair &amp; wouldn’t consider it, as IMO, dismissing a batter is about skill &amp; the Mankad requires zero skill. twitter.com/skycricket/sta…Stuart Broad wants to say that running early even before the bowler bowls is a skill and he loves it. twitter.com/StuartBroad8/s…Srini@softsignaloutWhat’s the skill from a bowler in a feather down the leg side . Or in a 4 or 6 by a tail ender from a thick top edge 3rd man @StuartBroad8 twitter.com/stuartbroad8/s…Stuart Broad@StuartBroad8So the Mankad is no longer unfair &amp; is now a legitimate dismissal. Hasn’t it always been a legitimate dismissal &amp; whether it is unfair is subjective? I think it is unfair &amp; wouldn’t consider it, as IMO, dismissing a batter is about skill &amp; the Mankad requires zero skill. twitter.com/skycricket/sta…5:34 AM · Mar 9, 2022366So the Mankad is no longer unfair &amp; is now a legitimate dismissal. Hasn’t it always been a legitimate dismissal &amp; whether it is unfair is subjective? I think it is unfair &amp; wouldn’t consider it, as IMO, dismissing a batter is about skill &amp; the Mankad requires zero skill. twitter.com/skycricket/sta…What’s the skill from a bowler in a feather down the leg side . Or in a 4 or 6 by a tail ender from a thick top edge 3rd man @StuartBroad8 twitter.com/stuartbroad8/s…Anindya Dutta #AdvantageIndia 🇮🇳@Cric_WriterGet off your high horse Stuart. It was never unfair. What’s unfair are your cheating buddies who try to steal an illegal run. It was always a run-out and now it’s called one. twitter.com/stuartbroad8/s…Stuart Broad@StuartBroad8So the Mankad is no longer unfair &amp; is now a legitimate dismissal. Hasn’t it always been a legitimate dismissal &amp; whether it is unfair is subjective? I think it is unfair &amp; wouldn’t consider it, as IMO, dismissing a batter is about skill &amp; the Mankad requires zero skill. twitter.com/skycricket/sta…7:11 AM · Mar 9, 2022111So the Mankad is no longer unfair &amp; is now a legitimate dismissal. Hasn’t it always been a legitimate dismissal &amp; whether it is unfair is subjective? I think it is unfair &amp; wouldn’t consider it, as IMO, dismissing a batter is about skill &amp; the Mankad requires zero skill. twitter.com/skycricket/sta…Get off your high horse Stuart. It was never unfair. What’s unfair are your cheating buddies who try to steal an illegal run. It was always a run-out and now it’s called one. twitter.com/stuartbroad8/s…Sammith@Sammith130Ayy @englandcricket take him into squad so he doesn’t have time to post nonsense twitter.com/stuartbroad8/s…Stuart Broad@StuartBroad8So the Mankad is no longer unfair &amp; is now a legitimate dismissal. Hasn’t it always been a legitimate dismissal &amp; whether it is unfair is subjective? I think it is unfair &amp; wouldn’t consider it, as IMO, dismissing a batter is about skill &amp; the Mankad requires zero skill. twitter.com/skycricket/sta…7:07 AM · Mar 9, 20221213So the Mankad is no longer unfair &amp; is now a legitimate dismissal. Hasn’t it always been a legitimate dismissal &amp; whether it is unfair is subjective? I think it is unfair &amp; wouldn’t consider it, as IMO, dismissing a batter is about skill &amp; the Mankad requires zero skill. twitter.com/skycricket/sta…Ayy @englandcricket take him into squad so he doesn’t have time to post nonsense twitter.com/stuartbroad8/s…Gurkirat Singh Gill@gurkiratsgillA lot of dismissals are not a function of skill of the bowler, like dismissal of a long hop, or a full toss, or a run out on the non striker's end through a deflection.'Mankading' as it used to be called, at least involved presence of mind, which is a skill. twitter.com/StuartBroad8/s…Stuart Broad@StuartBroad8So the Mankad is no longer unfair &amp; is now a legitimate dismissal. Hasn’t it always been a legitimate dismissal &amp; whether it is unfair is subjective? I think it is unfair &amp; wouldn’t consider it, as IMO, dismissing a batter is about skill &amp; the Mankad requires zero skill. twitter.com/skycricket/sta…6:15 AM · Mar 9, 202261847So the Mankad is no longer unfair &amp; is now a legitimate dismissal. Hasn’t it always been a legitimate dismissal &amp; whether it is unfair is subjective? I think it is unfair &amp; wouldn’t consider it, as IMO, dismissing a batter is about skill &amp; the Mankad requires zero skill. twitter.com/skycricket/sta…A lot of dismissals are not a function of skill of the bowler, like dismissal of a long hop, or a full toss, or a run out on the non striker's end through a deflection.'Mankading' as it used to be called, at least involved presence of mind, which is a skill. twitter.com/StuartBroad8/s…Uzair Arif@UzairArif_cricAgree twitter.com/stuartbroad8/s…Stuart Broad@StuartBroad8So the Mankad is no longer unfair &amp; is now a legitimate dismissal. Hasn’t it always been a legitimate dismissal &amp; whether it is unfair is subjective? I think it is unfair &amp; wouldn’t consider it, as IMO, dismissing a batter is about skill &amp; the Mankad requires zero skill. twitter.com/skycricket/sta…6:28 AM · Mar 9, 20223060213So the Mankad is no longer unfair &amp; is now a legitimate dismissal. Hasn’t it always been a legitimate dismissal &amp; whether it is unfair is subjective? I think it is unfair &amp; wouldn’t consider it, as IMO, dismissing a batter is about skill &amp; the Mankad requires zero skill. twitter.com/skycricket/sta…Agree 💯 twitter.com/stuartbroad8/s…Paritosh Kumar 🏏@Paritosh_2016Hey @StuartBroad8 scoring runs is all about skill and getting runs in over throw when ball is deflected off the bat requires “0” skill.Please return the world cup and give it to New Zealand.#ICC | #Mankad | #Mankading | #CricketTwitter twitter.com/StuartBroad8/s…Stuart Broad@StuartBroad8So the Mankad is no longer unfair &amp; is now a legitimate dismissal. Hasn’t it always been a legitimate dismissal &amp; whether it is unfair is subjective? I think it is unfair &amp; wouldn’t consider it, as IMO, dismissing a batter is about skill &amp; the Mankad requires zero skill. twitter.com/skycricket/sta…9:16 AM · Mar 9, 20222213So the Mankad is no longer unfair &amp; is now a legitimate dismissal. Hasn’t it always been a legitimate dismissal &amp; whether it is unfair is subjective? I think it is unfair &amp; wouldn’t consider it, as IMO, dismissing a batter is about skill &amp; the Mankad requires zero skill. twitter.com/skycricket/sta…Hey @StuartBroad8 scoring runs is all about skill and getting runs in over throw when ball is deflected off the bat requires “0” skill.Please return the world cup and give it to New Zealand.#ICC | #Mankad | #Mankading | #CricketTwitter twitter.com/StuartBroad8/s…Abhishek Mukherjee@ovshake42Is Maeve Douma on Twitter? She can put some sense into Broad.The dismissal was always fair and legitimate.The only one cheating is the non-striker.Oh, and it was always there.Thomas Barker did it five times between 1835 and 1843, by the way.Here is Nicholas Felix. twitter.com/StuartBroad8/s…Stuart Broad@StuartBroad8So the Mankad is no longer unfair &amp; is now a legitimate dismissal. Hasn’t it always been a legitimate dismissal &amp; whether it is unfair is subjective? I think it is unfair &amp; wouldn’t consider it, as IMO, dismissing a batter is about skill &amp; the Mankad requires zero skill. twitter.com/skycricket/sta…7:34 AM · Mar 9, 2022529So the Mankad is no longer unfair &amp; is now a legitimate dismissal. Hasn’t it always been a legitimate dismissal &amp; whether it is unfair is subjective? I think it is unfair &amp; wouldn’t consider it, as IMO, dismissing a batter is about skill &amp; the Mankad requires zero skill. twitter.com/skycricket/sta…Is Maeve Douma on Twitter? She can put some sense into Broad.The dismissal was always fair and legitimate.The only one cheating is the non-striker.Oh, and it was always there.Thomas Barker did it five times between 1835 and 1843, by the way.Here is Nicholas Felix. twitter.com/StuartBroad8/s… https://t.co/7zoQk0CR5bTSG@hooosier__daddyWhy so much fuss? He clearly said IMO, We all are supposed to have different opinions. twitter.com/stuartbroad8/s…Stuart Broad@StuartBroad8So the Mankad is no longer unfair &amp; is now a legitimate dismissal. Hasn’t it always been a legitimate dismissal &amp; whether it is unfair is subjective? I think it is unfair &amp; wouldn’t consider it, as IMO, dismissing a batter is about skill &amp; the Mankad requires zero skill. twitter.com/skycricket/sta…6:14 AM · Mar 9, 20226213So the Mankad is no longer unfair &amp; is now a legitimate dismissal. Hasn’t it always been a legitimate dismissal &amp; whether it is unfair is subjective? I think it is unfair &amp; wouldn’t consider it, as IMO, dismissing a batter is about skill &amp; the Mankad requires zero skill. twitter.com/skycricket/sta…Why so much fuss? He clearly said IMO, We all are supposed to have different opinions. twitter.com/stuartbroad8/s…cricBC@cricBCBreaking news: Next time Broad bowls a rank medium pace full toss down the leg side, and the batsman somehow loses balance, miscues the shot and hits straight to fine leg; he would call the batsman back coz there was no skills involved. twitter.com/StuartBroad8/s…Stuart Broad@StuartBroad8So the Mankad is no longer unfair &amp; is now a legitimate dismissal. Hasn’t it always been a legitimate dismissal &amp; whether it is unfair is subjective? I think it is unfair &amp; wouldn’t consider it, as IMO, dismissing a batter is about skill &amp; the Mankad requires zero skill. twitter.com/skycricket/sta…6:05 AM · Mar 9, 202211715So the Mankad is no longer unfair &amp; is now a legitimate dismissal. Hasn’t it always been a legitimate dismissal &amp; whether it is unfair is subjective? I think it is unfair &amp; wouldn’t consider it, as IMO, dismissing a batter is about skill &amp; the Mankad requires zero skill. twitter.com/skycricket/sta…Breaking news: Next time Broad bowls a rank medium pace full toss down the leg side, and the batsman somehow loses balance, miscues the shot and hits straight to fine leg; he would call the batsman back coz there was no skills involved. twitter.com/StuartBroad8/s…WV Raman@wvramanIt is not about skill, but getting punished for a crime. Of course, on a cricket field, it is about disregarding the laws of the game.. A traffic cop doesn't display skill when he books someone for jumping a traffic signal!! @StuartBroad88:10 AM · Mar 9, 202254442It is not about skill, but getting punished for a crime. Of course, on a cricket field, it is about disregarding the laws of the game.. A traffic cop doesn't display skill when he books someone for jumping a traffic signal!! @StuartBroad8Ketan | کیتن@Badka_Bokrait1 Stop calling it Mankading.2 Batter can't take undue advantage. They must be stopped.3 If it's about skills, will @StuartBroad8 say no to a wicket if he gets it on a bad ball? A full toss or a hit wicket or obstructing the field? twitter.com/StuartBroad8/s…Stuart Broad@StuartBroad8So the Mankad is no longer unfair &amp; is now a legitimate dismissal. Hasn’t it always been a legitimate dismissal &amp; whether it is unfair is subjective? I think it is unfair &amp; wouldn’t consider it, as IMO, dismissing a batter is about skill &amp; the Mankad requires zero skill. twitter.com/skycricket/sta…8:32 AM · Mar 9, 2022201So the Mankad is no longer unfair &amp; is now a legitimate dismissal. Hasn’t it always been a legitimate dismissal &amp; whether it is unfair is subjective? I think it is unfair &amp; wouldn’t consider it, as IMO, dismissing a batter is about skill &amp; the Mankad requires zero skill. twitter.com/skycricket/sta…1 Stop calling it Mankading.2 Batter can't take undue advantage. They must be stopped.3 If it's about skills, will @StuartBroad8 say no to a wicket if he gets it on a bad ball? A full toss or a hit wicket or obstructing the field? twitter.com/StuartBroad8/s…Hamza@HamzaMughal321I agree with Broad here. Yes batsmen need to be stopped from taking extra advantage but can't that be done by giving penalty of a few runs? Just like the no ball scenario. Just imagine the ball hasn't even been delivered and you're run out and that's it for the batsman. twitter.com/StuartBroad8/s…Stuart Broad@StuartBroad8So the Mankad is no longer unfair &amp; is now a legitimate dismissal. Hasn’t it always been a legitimate dismissal &amp; whether it is unfair is subjective? I think it is unfair &amp; wouldn’t consider it, as IMO, dismissing a batter is about skill &amp; the Mankad requires zero skill. twitter.com/skycricket/sta…6:02 AM · Mar 9, 20223066213So the Mankad is no longer unfair &amp; is now a legitimate dismissal. Hasn’t it always been a legitimate dismissal &amp; whether it is unfair is subjective? I think it is unfair &amp; wouldn’t consider it, as IMO, dismissing a batter is about skill &amp; the Mankad requires zero skill. twitter.com/skycricket/sta…I agree with Broad here. Yes batsmen need to be stopped from taking extra advantage but can't that be done by giving penalty of a few runs? Just like the no ball scenario. Just imagine the ball hasn't even been delivered and you're run out and that's it for the batsman. twitter.com/StuartBroad8/s…Andrew Fidel Fernando@afidelfThe cricket world (you can see the Lord's press box) if non-striker run outs were five penalty runs twitter.com/StuartBroad8/s…Stuart Broad@StuartBroad8So the Mankad is no longer unfair &amp; is now a legitimate dismissal. Hasn’t it always been a legitimate dismissal &amp; whether it is unfair is subjective? I think it is unfair &amp; wouldn’t consider it, as IMO, dismissing a batter is about skill &amp; the Mankad requires zero skill. twitter.com/skycricket/sta…5:37 AM · Mar 9, 2022344So the Mankad is no longer unfair &amp; is now a legitimate dismissal. Hasn’t it always been a legitimate dismissal &amp; whether it is unfair is subjective? I think it is unfair &amp; wouldn’t consider it, as IMO, dismissing a batter is about skill &amp; the Mankad requires zero skill. twitter.com/skycricket/sta…The cricket world (you can see the Lord's press box) if non-striker run outs were five penalty runs twitter.com/StuartBroad8/s… https://t.co/oC4bWYXIf1Jack@Switch_hittYou talking about fairness? Must be joking. twitter.com/StuartBroad8/s…Stuart Broad@StuartBroad8So the Mankad is no longer unfair &amp; is now a legitimate dismissal. Hasn’t it always been a legitimate dismissal &amp; whether it is unfair is subjective? I think it is unfair &amp; wouldn’t consider it, as IMO, dismissing a batter is about skill &amp; the Mankad requires zero skill. twitter.com/skycricket/sta…9:05 AM · Mar 9, 20229213So the Mankad is no longer unfair &amp; is now a legitimate dismissal. Hasn’t it always been a legitimate dismissal &amp; whether it is unfair is subjective? I think it is unfair &amp; wouldn’t consider it, as IMO, dismissing a batter is about skill &amp; the Mankad requires zero skill. twitter.com/skycricket/sta…You talking about fairness? Must be joking. twitter.com/StuartBroad8/s… https://t.co/JdXdxun9M3Dweplea@dwepleaGame awareness is a skill. Being caught napping is a lack of skill. twitter.com/stuartbroad8/s…Stuart Broad@StuartBroad8So the Mankad is no longer unfair &amp; is now a legitimate dismissal. Hasn’t it always been a legitimate dismissal &amp; whether it is unfair is subjective? I think it is unfair &amp; wouldn’t consider it, as IMO, dismissing a batter is about skill &amp; the Mankad requires zero skill. twitter.com/skycricket/sta…8:58 AM · Mar 9, 20227611So the Mankad is no longer unfair &amp; is now a legitimate dismissal. Hasn’t it always been a legitimate dismissal &amp; whether it is unfair is subjective? I think it is unfair &amp; wouldn’t consider it, as IMO, dismissing a batter is about skill &amp; the Mankad requires zero skill. twitter.com/skycricket/sta…Game awareness is a skill. Being caught napping is a lack of skill. twitter.com/stuartbroad8/s…Mission Bharatvarsh@SaffronNetajiAny bowler conceding 6 sixes in an over should be called 'Broad' twitter.com/StuartBroad8/s…Stuart Broad@StuartBroad8So the Mankad is no longer unfair &amp; is now a legitimate dismissal. Hasn’t it always been a legitimate dismissal &amp; whether it is unfair is subjective? I think it is unfair &amp; wouldn’t consider it, as IMO, dismissing a batter is about skill &amp; the Mankad requires zero skill. twitter.com/skycricket/sta…8:09 AM · Mar 9, 20221213So the Mankad is no longer unfair &amp; is now a legitimate dismissal. Hasn’t it always been a legitimate dismissal &amp; whether it is unfair is subjective? I think it is unfair &amp; wouldn’t consider it, as IMO, dismissing a batter is about skill &amp; the Mankad requires zero skill. twitter.com/skycricket/sta…Any bowler conceding 6 sixes in an over should be called 'Broad' twitter.com/StuartBroad8/s…Aditya@AdityakrsahaScoring runs in Cricket is also about skill. twitter.com/StuartBroad8/s…Stuart Broad@StuartBroad8So the Mankad is no longer unfair &amp; is now a legitimate dismissal. Hasn’t it always been a legitimate dismissal &amp; whether it is unfair is subjective? I think it is unfair &amp; wouldn’t consider it, as IMO, dismissing a batter is about skill &amp; the Mankad requires zero skill. twitter.com/skycricket/sta…7:54 AM · Mar 9, 2022527So the Mankad is no longer unfair &amp; is now a legitimate dismissal. Hasn’t it always been a legitimate dismissal &amp; whether it is unfair is subjective? I think it is unfair &amp; wouldn’t consider it, as IMO, dismissing a batter is about skill &amp; the Mankad requires zero skill. twitter.com/skycricket/sta…Scoring runs in Cricket is also about skill. twitter.com/StuartBroad8/s… https://t.co/U54MjZhql1.@gillfan_Want Sunny G treatment for this man twitter.com/StuartBroad8/s…Stuart Broad@StuartBroad8So the Mankad is no longer unfair &amp; is now a legitimate dismissal. Hasn’t it always been a legitimate dismissal &amp; whether it is unfair is subjective? I think it is unfair &amp; wouldn’t consider it, as IMO, dismissing a batter is about skill &amp; the Mankad requires zero skill. twitter.com/skycricket/sta…7:22 AM · Mar 9, 20222213So the Mankad is no longer unfair &amp; is now a legitimate dismissal. Hasn’t it always been a legitimate dismissal &amp; whether it is unfair is subjective? I think it is unfair &amp; wouldn’t consider it, as IMO, dismissing a batter is about skill &amp; the Mankad requires zero skill. twitter.com/skycricket/sta…Want Sunny G treatment for this man twitter.com/StuartBroad8/s…Venkata Krishna B@venkatatweetsTaking undue advantage by strolling out of the crease before a ball is delivered isn't skill either. It is plain cheating. twitter.com/StuartBroad8/s…Stuart Broad@StuartBroad8So the Mankad is no longer unfair &amp; is now a legitimate dismissal. Hasn’t it always been a legitimate dismissal &amp; whether it is unfair is subjective? I think it is unfair &amp; wouldn’t consider it, as IMO, dismissing a batter is about skill &amp; the Mankad requires zero skill. twitter.com/skycricket/sta…7:14 AM · Mar 9, 2022507So the Mankad is no longer unfair &amp; is now a legitimate dismissal. Hasn’t it always been a legitimate dismissal &amp; whether it is unfair is subjective? I think it is unfair &amp; wouldn’t consider it, as IMO, dismissing a batter is about skill &amp; the Mankad requires zero skill. twitter.com/skycricket/sta…Taking undue advantage by strolling out of the crease before a ball is delivered isn't skill either. It is plain cheating. twitter.com/StuartBroad8/s…Venkata Krishna B@venkatatweetsAlso it is not Mankad. It is totally unfair to call it by his name. It is merely run-out at non-strikers end. Don't know how you will take if a batter gets called Broad each time he refuses to walk after edging to first slip. twitter.com/StuartBroad8/s…Stuart Broad@StuartBroad8So the Mankad is no longer unfair &amp; is now a legitimate dismissal. Hasn’t it always been a legitimate dismissal &amp; whether it is unfair is subjective? I think it is unfair &amp; wouldn’t consider it, as IMO, dismissing a batter is about skill &amp; the Mankad requires zero skill. twitter.com/skycricket/sta…7:19 AM · Mar 9, 20222086358So the Mankad is no longer unfair &amp; is now a legitimate dismissal. Hasn’t it always been a legitimate dismissal &amp; whether it is unfair is subjective? I think it is unfair &amp; wouldn’t consider it, as IMO, dismissing a batter is about skill &amp; the Mankad requires zero skill. twitter.com/skycricket/sta…Also it is not Mankad. It is totally unfair to call it by his name. It is merely run-out at non-strikers end. Don't know how you will take if a batter gets called Broad each time he refuses to walk after edging to first slip. twitter.com/StuartBroad8/s…ً@eliteopinionzYeah like you guys didn't win the 2019 worldcup through sheer stupidity of rules twitter.com/StuartBroad8/s…Stuart Broad@StuartBroad8So the Mankad is no longer unfair &amp; is now a legitimate dismissal. Hasn’t it always been a legitimate dismissal &amp; whether it is unfair is subjective? I think it is unfair &amp; wouldn’t consider it, as IMO, dismissing a batter is about skill &amp; the Mankad requires zero skill. twitter.com/skycricket/sta…6:38 AM · Mar 9, 202231So the Mankad is no longer unfair &amp; is now a legitimate dismissal. Hasn’t it always been a legitimate dismissal &amp; whether it is unfair is subjective? I think it is unfair &amp; wouldn’t consider it, as IMO, dismissing a batter is about skill &amp; the Mankad requires zero skill. twitter.com/skycricket/sta…Yeah like you guys didn't win the 2019 worldcup through sheer stupidity of rules twitter.com/StuartBroad8/s…Venkata Krishna B@venkatatweetsAlso it is not Mankad. It is totally unfair to call it by his name. It is merely run-out at non-strikers end. Don't know how you will take if a batter gets called Broad each time he refuses to walk after edging to first slip. twitter.com/StuartBroad8/s…Stuart Broad@StuartBroad8So the Mankad is no longer unfair &amp; is now a legitimate dismissal. Hasn’t it always been a legitimate dismissal &amp; whether it is unfair is subjective? I think it is unfair &amp; wouldn’t consider it, as IMO, dismissing a batter is about skill &amp; the Mankad requires zero skill. twitter.com/skycricket/sta…7:19 AM · Mar 9, 20222000340So the Mankad is no longer unfair &amp; is now a legitimate dismissal. Hasn’t it always been a legitimate dismissal &amp; whether it is unfair is subjective? I think it is unfair &amp; wouldn’t consider it, as IMO, dismissing a batter is about skill &amp; the Mankad requires zero skill. twitter.com/skycricket/sta…Also it is not Mankad. It is totally unfair to call it by his name. It is merely run-out at non-strikers end. Don't know how you will take if a batter gets called Broad each time he refuses to walk after edging to first slip. twitter.com/StuartBroad8/s…Suraj Pandey@ferrarinotfiatI think it is unfair &amp; wouldn’t consider it, as IMO, hitting a ball is about skill &amp; the Overthrow requires zero skill. twitter.com/stuartbroad8/s…Stuart Broad@StuartBroad8So the Mankad is no longer unfair &amp; is now a legitimate dismissal. Hasn’t it always been a legitimate dismissal &amp; whether it is unfair is subjective? I think it is unfair &amp; wouldn’t consider it, as IMO, dismissing a batter is about skill &amp; the Mankad requires zero skill. twitter.com/skycricket/sta…10:08 AM · Mar 9, 202211So the Mankad is no longer unfair &amp; is now a legitimate dismissal. Hasn’t it always been a legitimate dismissal &amp; whether it is unfair is subjective? I think it is unfair &amp; wouldn’t consider it, as IMO, dismissing a batter is about skill &amp; the Mankad requires zero skill. twitter.com/skycricket/sta…I think it is unfair &amp; wouldn’t consider it, as IMO, hitting a ball is about skill &amp; the Overthrow requires zero skill. twitter.com/stuartbroad8/s…&quot;It is legitimate, it is a run-out&quot; - MCC Laws ManagerExplaining the thinking behind the change, Fraser Stewart, MCC Laws Manager, admitted to the Times that bowlers are always &quot;painted as the villain&quot; for running out the non-striker.He announced that the dismissal is legitimate and warrants being in the run-out section of the law book, saying:&quot;The bowler is always painted as the villain but it is a legitimate way to dismiss someone and it is the non-striker who is stealing the ground. It is legitimate, it is a run-out and therefore it should live in the run-out section of the laws.&quot;There have been other changes to the laws as well, including the banning of saliva to shine the ball and the judgment of wides. The 2022 T20 World Cup will be the first major ICC tournament under the new rules.

No Results Found