WTC FINAL: DID INDIA GET THEIR PLAYING XI WRONG AGAINST NZ?

2

India clearly missed someone like a Bhuvneshwar Kumar

IMAGE CREDITS: GETTY

It was no surprise that queries were being raised over Bhuvneshwar Kumar’s exclusion as India’s fast bowlers failed to deliver the goods in the WTC final. Doesn’t matter that the Bhuvneshwar hasn’t played Test cricket since 2018. Considering what was at stake, it was a risk worth taking.

IMAGE CREDITS: GETTY

Also, due to COVID-19, teams are allowed to travel with a bigger squad. India could definitely have included the swing bowler’s name. Not only did Bhuvneshwar make a superb comeback in the limited-overs matches against England at home, but he has also tasted success in English conditions.

IMAGE CREDITS: GETTY

Bhuvneshwar has played five Tests in England, all during the 2014 tour. He claimed 19 wickets, with two five-wicket hauls. He also made an impact with the bat, scoring three fifties. Also, with Bhuvneshwar around India could have opted the option of playing four seamers in the WTC final.

IMAGE CREDITS: GETTY

1

Mohammed Siraj should have played over Ishant Sharma

IMAGE CREDITS: GETTY

Mohammed Siraj or Ishant Sharma? That was the million-dollar question for Team India ahead of the WTC final against New Zealand. India eventually decided to go with the experience of Ishant ahead of Siraj's X-factor, as experience counts for a lot in a big clash like the WTC final.

IMAGE CREDITS: GETTY

In hindsight though, one has to admit that Team India got it wrong with their selection for the WTC final. The pitch and conditions in Southampton were tailor-made for swing bowling. Yet, their only genuine swing bowler in the squad - Mohammed Siraj was not part of the playing XI.

IMAGE CREDITS: GETTY

In seamer-friendly conditions, Indian captain Virat Kohli had to turn to off-spinner R Ashwin to give the team the breakthrough in both innings. Though Mohammed Shami, impressed after a slow start, Ishant and Jasprit Bumrah clearly struggled for the most part to swing the Dukes ball.

IMAGE CREDITS: GETTY