ISL 2017, Match 34: Mumbai City FC vs Delhi Dynamos, Player Ratings

Balwant Singh just cannot stop scoring. (Photo: ISL)
Balwant Singh just cannot stop scoring. (Photo: ISL)

Delhi Dynamos

Arnab Das Sharma had a poor game. (Photo: ISL)
Arnab Das Sharma had a poor game. (Photo: ISL)

Arnab Das Sharma (4/10): Poor is the only word that can be used to describe Arnab. All the four goals Delhi conceded were in some way or the other the keeper’s fault and had he been a bit better all the four goals could have been avoided.

Pritam Kotal (5.5/10): Pritam has been below average this season, and had another poor game as he was beaten time in, time out by the likes of Thiago and Abhinash Ruidas.

Pratik Chowdhury (5.5/10): Pratik's anticipation was poor, and he committed a lot of silly fouls which someway or the other came back to haunt Delhi.

Edu Moya (6.5/10): Edu was one of the better players for Delhi as he tried to control the midfield and also played some good passes for his forwards.

Jeroen Lumu (7/10): Lumu was one of the best players on the pitch for Delhi, even though he played in an unusual position as left back, he looked pretty comfortable in his position.

Matias Mirabaje (4.5/10): Mirabaje hit the post in the first half before being sent off for a brawl he got into with Shenaj.

Vinit Rai (6.5/10): Vinit had another good game, even though his side lost, the lad from Assam did a good job in closing down the Mumbai midfielders.

Paulinho Dias (6/10): Paulinho didn’t have a good game as he failed to check the likes of Balwant of Emana. His anticipation and distribution to were not of desired quality.

Nandhakumar Sekar (5/10): The ISL debutant had the best chance of the game probably but he failed miserably as he failed to connect with the ball, with just an empty net in front of him.

Romeo Fernandes (7/10): Romeo was probably the best Delhi player on the pitch, as he tried very hard to create openings. He also ran down the flanks all night and got into some pretty dangerous positions to score from. However, he lacked the required support that was needed in front.

Guyon Fernandez (5.5/10): We hardly saw Guyon Fernandez with the ball. Guyon didn’t have much success down the flanks. To add to that, he looked isolated down the flanks.

Quick Links