Sushil Kumar - 4 controversies that harmed his image and career

What a fall from grace it has been for Sushil Kumar Solanki. The Haryanvi grappler from Baprola [in West Delhi] is currently behind bars for the alleged murder of a junior wrestler, Sagar Dhankad.Delhi Police are investigating the brawl that took Sagar's life on 4 May and the celebrated wrestler is one of the prime suspects in the case. Maybe Sushil Kumar was not the 'son of the soil' as we all perceived him to be.Born to poor but determined parents, Sushil Kumar gave it his all to make his name in wrestling.He crashed out on his debut at the Athens Olympics in 2004, but came back heroically to shock one and all by winning a bronze medal at the Beijing Olympics in 2008.Sushil Kumar's rise had only begun. He created history at the 2010 World Championships where he won the first ever gold medal for India in the competition. He also became the first Indian to win consecutive medals at the Olympics. He added a silver medal at London 2012 to his Beijing bronze, despite fighting stomach cramps at the event.Sushil Kumar was once the apple of the nation's eye and the face of Indian wrestling. Even after a World Championship gold and back-to-back Olympic medals to his credit, Sushil Kumar had the potential to achieve much more. However, bad luck and poor decisions have seemingly destroyed his career.While the trials controversy before the Rio Olympics robbed him of popular support, the current controversy over Sagar Dhankad's murder has meant his career is all but over.Here are some of the controversies that destroyed both Sushil Kumar's image and his career for once and for all.Sushil Kumar - 5 career-ruining controversies1. Sushil Kumar's contentious semi-final win at the London Olympics London Olympics - Where it all began for Sushil KumarSushil cruised to the finals of the London Olympics with ease. He displayed dazzling wrestling skills in the semifinal as he crushed Akzhurek Tantarov of Kazakhstan, pummeling him 2-1. What few people focus on though is the fact that Akzhurek accused Sushil of foul play, saying the Indian had bitten him beneath his ear.After a historic victory at the 2010 World Championships, Sushil Kumar was India's best bet for an Olympic medal. He led the Indian contingent at the opening ceremony of the London Olympics, and was all set to fulfill India's expectations with another medal.Sushil did not disappoint either. In his very opening match, he faced Ramzan Sahin of Turkey, who was the reigning Olympic champion of the 66kg category in which Sushil had won a bronze before.Sushil overcame Ramzan, defeating him 2-1 in his opening bout after suffering an early setback. Likewise, Sushil defeated his quarterfinal opponent from Uzbekistan with ease before meeting Azhurek.Akzhurek was brought hurtling down by an impressive move by Sushil Kumar. However, a close grapple between the two left the Kazakh wrestler bleeding, and he accused Sushil Kumar of biting off his ear lobe. The authorities turned a deaf ear to his allegations, but this was probably a signal that things were not as bright as it seemed with Sushil.2. Narsingh Pancham Yadav's doping fiasco Narsingh Pancham Yadav - The man who changed it all for Sushil KumarBy the time the Rio Olympics had come around, a lot had changed in amateur wrestling. A few categories had been abolished which included Sushil Kumar's 66 kg. Also, the the bouts were reduced to two rounds of three minutes each, instead of the previous three rounds.Sushil now had two options - either compete in the 65 kg category, which meant grappling with another stalwart and his best friend Yogeshwar Dutt who had won bronze at the London Olympics, or go up to 74 kg.Sushil opted for the second option for two reasons. One, he could then focus on his body building, and two, his opponent in that category was Narsingh Pancham Yadav who seemed an easier adversary to him.But Narsingh was not a pushover. He had clinched a bronze medal at the Incheon Asian Games in 2014 as well as World Championships in 2015, the latter of which saw him employ a spectacular Meanwhile, Sushil missed the Olympic qualifying tournament and put in an unusual request by demanding a one-on-one trial against Narsingh.This was rare but not unheard of. Pappu Yadav had made the cut for the Atlanta Olympics in the Greco-Roman category through a trial.However, the Wrestling Federation of India did not acceede to his demand and Narsingh was selected to go to the Rio Olympics to compete in the 74 kg category.However, things took a dark turn when it was found that Narsingh had taken substances banned by the World Anti-Doping Agency. Narsingh vehemently denied it.He cried sabotage, saying his food and water had been spiked, with Sushil the obvious suspect. After a lot of twists and turns, Narsingh was handed a four-year ban.

No Results Found