#4 It devalues the rest of the roster
The fact that a 50-year old man who hasn't wrestled in 12 years, can walk into the biggest wrestling company in the world and beat the most protected wrestler on the roster is an absolute disgrace.
On top of that, him winning the rumble would be an even bigger slap in the face of all the legitimately talented workers in the company.
Think of the names that have tried to beat Lesnar clean over the past two years: John Cena, Seth Rollins, The Undertaker, Randy Orton and Roman Reigns have all failed, but Goldberg succeeded in record time, how?
The one beast that tore through EVERYONE, was beaten by a 50-year old in two minutes. What was the point of the previous two years of booking? I genuinely cannot see what Bill brings that the current roster doesn't.
He's not a draw, he's not a star attraction, he's just a washed-up wrestler that was incredibly pushed back in the day. If he can waltz in and do what several others can't, it makes the rest of the roster look worthless.
People complain that the WWE doesn't create enough new stars but then are happy when ex-stars come in and devalue the current ones. Talk about being counter-productive.
