Create
Notifications
Favorites Edit
Advertisement

India Vs Australia: 3rd Test, 9 reasons why Kohli should have enforced the follow-on

ANALYST
Top 5 / Top 10
7.64K   //    28 Dec 2018, 17:15 IST

By not enforcing the follow-on, Kohli has proved himself to be a defensive captain
By not enforcing the follow-on, Kohli has proved himself to be a defensive captain

India bundled out Australia for 151 in the first innings immediately after tea on the third day of the third Test match at Melbourne. India thereby took a lead of 292 in the first innings. For India, Jasprit Bumrah took 6 for 33. India finish the day on 54 for 5 with an overall lead of 346 going into the fourth day’s play.

When India took a first innings lead of 292, everyone expected them to enforce the follow-on and go for the kill. However, captain Virat Kohli decided to bat again. After VVS Laxman and Rahul Dravid’s coup at Eden Gardens all the way back in 2001, captains have normally been reluctant to enforce the follow-on. This brings us to the discussion about Kohli’s surprise decision.


#1 The psychological advantage and the huge first innings lead

The first innings lead of 292 was a huge lead. If it had been 210 or so, Kohli could have been justified in his decision but with huge first innings lead he could have gone in for the kill without any hesitation. That would have given India the psychological advantage for the rest of the series. Besides, there is enough in this pitch to clean up Australia for less than 292 in the second innings.

#2 The Indian bowlers were not all that exhausted

In the first innings, the Indian bowlers managed to knock over Australia in 67 overs. Out of the 67 overs, 28 overs were bowled by the spinners, The remaining 39 overs were shared among the 3 fast bowlers. Out of which Mohammad Shami had bowled a mere 10 overs. The Indian bowlers were not all that exhausted. They could have had a crack at the Aussie batsmen before the close of play on day 3.

#3 Weather interference on the cards on the last day

There are chances of weather interfering the proceedings on the last day of the Test match. Though cricket is not played with one eye on the sky, it is always better to heed to weather forecast rather than being sorry in the end.

#4 Making it easier for Australia to play out for a draw by wasting precious time

By not enforcing the follow-on, Kohli has now given a chance for Australia to play for a draw as crucial time will be consumed by the Indian batting in the second innings. Australia would now look to bat out the fourth day and hope for the best on the last day.

#5 History against Kohli

It is not every day an Indian captain gets a chance to enforce a follow-on against Australia in Australia. The last time Australia were asked to follow-on in Australia was back in 1986 against England in Brisbane. England won that match by 7 wickets. Saurav Ganguly had a chance to enforce the follow-on at Sydney in 2003. Like Kohli, he opted to bat on in the second innings and Australia managed to hang on to a draw in Steve Waugh’s last Test match.


1 / 3 NEXT
Tags:
Advertisement