YouTuber discloses losing $8,000 in revenue after Adin Ross allegedly falsely claimed their video

YouTuber Internet Anarchist, with a subscriber base exceeding 200K, recently disclosed that Adin Ross made a false claim on one of his videos. Consequently, he was deprived of the revenue generated from the video, which amounted to a sum of around $8K, which he referred to as &quot;life-changing money.&quot; The disputed video, titled &quot;Sneako's Horrible Response To Penguinz0,&quot; was uploaded on March 19 with over 1.5 million views. It included a segment from Adin Ross' stream, resulting in the streamer filing a copyright claim. The video detailed the recent controversy between Sneako and Charlie &quot;MoistCr1TiKaL.&quot;However, the YouTuber contended that the clip was utilized under fair use provisions and therefore deemed the copyright claim to be unwarranted.Internet Anarchist@internetanarchi just lost $8,000 from Adin Ross false claiming my video about the Penguinz0 vs Sneako situation. fvck you @adinross4575242i just lost $8,000 from Adin Ross false claiming my video about the Penguinz0 vs Sneako situation. 😭fvck you @adinross https://t.co/ex7zIfaIHRYouTuber calls out Adin Ross for &quot;falsely claiming&quot; his videoFollowing this, Internet Anarchist shared additional updates on the matter. In one of his posts, he disclosed the specific video that Adin claimed and affirmed that the portion of Adin's stream that he utilized was done legitimately. Expressing his disappointment with the loss, he underscored the significance of the income, describing it as &quot;life-changing&quot; for him. He wrote:Internet Anarchist@internetanarchThe claim was received on my video &quot;Sneako's Horrible Response To Penguinz0&quot; where I used a stream clip of Adin Ross interviewing Sneako. It was used under fair use grounds and a tiny part of my long video.The revenue from this video was almost life changing money for me..86311The claim was received on my video &quot;Sneako's Horrible Response To Penguinz0&quot; where I used a stream clip of Adin Ross interviewing Sneako. It was used under fair use grounds and a tiny part of my long video.The revenue from this video was almost life changing money for me..He also called out Adin for depriving him of the earnings from his hard work, pointing out that the latter has a gambling addiction while he is still an emerging content creator. His tweet read:Internet Anarchist@internetanarchIt was one of my most successful videos so its a huge shame to have the fruits of my labour taken away from me all of a sudden. Especially by someone who literally gets paid 10s of millions to gamble in front of kids.8069It was one of my most successful videos so its a huge shame to have the fruits of my labour taken away from me all of a sudden. Especially by someone who literally gets paid 10s of millions to gamble in front of kids.One user suggested that he should counter-sue Adin for falsely claiming the video. However, the Internet Anarchist stated that Adin has far greater resources and would win any potential legal battles:Internet Anarchist@internetanarch@ChanceForClout @adinross Adin could drain me in legal fees, his worth like 1,000x me.4732@ChanceForClout @adinross Adin could drain me in legal fees, his worth like 1,000x me.The Internet Anarchist also disclosed the name of the third-party company that filed the claim on the video:Internet Anarchist@internetanarch@defnoodles @adinross Yes, a party named &quot;thumb media affiliate&quot;, same people involved in abusing copyright system with Speed clips.@defnoodles @adinross Yes, a party named &quot;thumb media affiliate&quot;, same people involved in abusing copyright system with Speed clips.Here's what the internet saidIn the replies, fans expressed their views on the situation and criticized Adin for outsourcing the claim to a third-party company. Several users suggested filing an appeal against the claim, which could result in restoring the video to the YouTuber. Here are some notable reactions:Jabroney@JabroneyTV@internetanarch @adinross Dispute it, money will go into escrow until this is settled762@internetanarch @adinross Dispute it, money will go into escrow until this is settledSYREX🤯@SyrexxTV@internetanarch @adinross Just appeal it you’ll win probs won’t even need a lawyer if it was fair use1@internetanarch @adinross Just appeal it you’ll win 🏆 probs won’t even need a lawyer if it was fair useAshRyo@YourFavFrnchBoi@internetanarch @adinross I mean I totally understand that you worked hard on your video and it sad to hear that… but as a YouTube content creator you should know the risk of using someone else work ? Normalize the fact that when you guys make money on someone’s name at least send a email before, just… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…2@internetanarch @adinross I mean I totally understand that you worked hard on your video and it sad to hear that… but as a YouTube content creator you should know the risk of using someone else work ? Normalize the fact that when you guys make money on someone’s name at least send a email before, just… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…SuperGamingAli@ali_lefty@internetanarch @adinross Common Adin Ross L77@internetanarch @adinross Common Adin Ross LDolan Dark@DolanDark@internetanarch @adinross He only gets the money from the moment the video is claimed so if it had made $8k before the claim, you will still get to keep that, though you should obviously still fight the claim anyway if it was fair use4886@internetanarch @adinross He only gets the money from the moment the video is claimed so if it had made $8k before the claim, you will still get to keep that, though you should obviously still fight the claim anyway if it was fair usemori@morihq@internetanarch @adinross This isn't even legal. It's completely fair use. Dispute the claim and it should be lifted after 30 days if he doesn't respond and you should receive any revenue that was earned during that time. Unless Adin decides to reject and escalate, (which I doubt he will) you should be… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…491@internetanarch @adinross This isn't even legal. It's completely fair use. Dispute the claim and it should be lifted after 30 days if he doesn't respond and you should receive any revenue that was earned during that time. Unless Adin decides to reject and escalate, (which I doubt he will) you should be… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…StreamerTV 📺@Str3merTV@internetanarch @adinross If the video is fair use %100 counter that claim it don’t matter the power adinross has if the video is fair use adin can’t do sh*t, judge looks at fair use not adins ego.. counter that claim1@internetanarch @adinross If the video is fair use %100 counter that claim it don’t matter the power adinross has if the video is fair use adin can’t do sh*t, judge looks at fair use not adins ego.. counter that claim https://t.co/q4CE0h07d7ANN3THRAX@ANN3THRAX@internetanarch @adinross It's crazy how little issue people have with taking or destroying another's livelihood just because they can... It's beyond petty, it's gross@internetanarch @adinross It's crazy how little issue people have with taking or destroying another's livelihood just because they can... It's beyond petty, it's grosssoft boi nick 🦊@simple_nicks@internetanarch @anonbirdd @adinross @JustSoTippy covered this in a recent video, I dont think Adin Ross intentionally did it. But unsure if releasing the claim will return your $80004@internetanarch @anonbirdd @adinross @JustSoTippy covered this in a recent video, I dont think Adin Ross intentionally did it. But unsure if releasing the claim will return your $8000Despite the copyright claim issue, the Internet Anarchist continues to upload content weekly. His videos mainly cover internet controversies related to social media and streaming.It is currently uncertain whether the YouTuber will challenge the copyright claim. As of writing this, Adin Ross has not commented on the situation.

No Results Found