COOKIE CONSENT
Create
Notifications
Favorites Edit
Advertisement

How the Premier League became the best league in the world again

OFFICIAL
Feature
955   //    17 Mar 2019, 22:07 IST

City have been in ferocious form under Guardiola and are one of the best teams in Europe.
City have been in ferocious form under Guardiola and are one of the best teams in Europe.

The 2014-15 UEFA Champions League season was probably the lowest point for English football in Europe over the last 15 years. After Liverpool were demoted to the Europa League after having finished 3rd in their group, the trio of Manchester City, Arsenal and Chelsea were sent packing in the Round of 16.

About 5 years from then on, four English teams have made it to the quarter-finals of the Champions League, representing a change in fortunes for not just the clubs involved, but for English football as a whole. It demonstrates a change in how English football is perceived, especially after the senior National side reached the semi-finals of the World Cup, the Under-20s won their World Cup and the Under-17s won their World Cup in India.

There isn’t one reason to thank for the success of English clubs in Europe. It isn’t success per se but it is certainly better than the 2014-15 season.

It is crucial to look at Manchester City, Tottenham, and Liverpool in this case. While Manchester United are a force to be reckoned with under Ole Solskjaer, their miracle in Paris was down to tactical flexibility that the side portrayed throughout the game. They rode their luck, which isn’t a bad thing in football. And fought for every loose ball. And PSG played it right into United’s hands.

The case of City, Spurs, and Liverpool represents a pattern of consistency in management- a one that is key to success on bigger platforms. Teams that have mastered the art of playing a certain way go far in the competition, as evident from the successes of Real Madrid, Atletico Madrid, Barcelona, and Juventus. The Old Lady and the Los Rojiblancos may not have won the title yet, but they have pragmatic approaches to the game that have now been mastered under Diego Simeone and Massimiliano Allegri.

When Pep Guardiola joined Manchester City, he took a season to get to grips with the nature of the Premier League. But there were glimpses of what the ideal Guardiola-esque City side would be like. Of course, money is a factor too. As it helped City get the players they needed to perfect the Guardiola way.

And over time, we have seen City mature into a team that is pretty much invincible on its day. Maturity doesn’t just mean growth in terms of age or getting used to playing that way. The players have gained Champions League experience over time. But above all, they have acquired the ability to dig out games. They know how to approach games if Plan A doesn’t work.

Guardiola obviously had to overcome disappointing knockouts at the hands of Monaco and Liverpool, but this season has seen City churn out close wins in the Premier League. Recent wins over Bournemouth and West Ham are examples. These were the sort of games when the City side from last season may not have won. But Guardiola hasn’t just helped this side improve, he has matured this side into a well-rounded unit.

Something similar has happened with the projects that Mauricio Pochettino and Jurgen Klopp have at Spurs and Liverpool. It has been gradual growth; gradual development. Liverpool were struggling to grind results out last season. They slipped up at vital moments and fell when the pressure was pushing them in the face.

Advertisement

Of course, both City and Liverpool have had the backing of financial packages. And that is why they are currently a better side than Spurs, who are yet to spend in the last two transfer windows.

Not to say that Spurs haven’t matured. From being knocked out of the Champions League in the group stages in a group that had Monaco and CSKA Moscow and to being edged by a formidable Juventus side, they have come a long way. The win over Borussia Dortmund was more a test of which is the most complete side out of the two usually free-flowing line-ups.

And Spurs having played in the competition for 2 seasons, progressed. They have had quite the same squad as 2 seasons ago. They have learned together and have improved together. They have fallen together and have learned how to play in the Champions League together. The way they defended against Dortmund in the second leg showed that they are a more complete side than the German side.

Much like Liverpool, Spurs have won many games this season when they weren’t at their best. They have relied on playing dirty to get three points. We haven’t seen them play as much free-flowing football as we did last season. But they have managed to win. The way Liverpool played away to Crystal Palace and Huddersfield was a reflection of that. And the way Spurs played against Wolves away, Newcastle and Watford at home among others proves that.

It is the advantage of having almost the same side playing under the same manager with the same system for a good amount of time. Teams that do that complete themselves over time. They see the same faces turn up in the same positions every week and they get used to everything to a point where it becomes a habit. And like a routine, it feels good.

Spurs’ struggles before Pochettino were very apparent. They had no fixed approach to the game and no consistency in finishing inside the top four. The club had 5 different managers in 6 years and they had played in the UEFA Champions League only once.

Liverpool had found a direction under Brendan Rodgers but it came to a stuttering halt after the money spent from the sale of Luis Suarez dragged them back instead of taking them forward.

City did win the title under Manuel Pellegrini but they didn’t have an approach to the games that they had mastered. While they had played in the Champions League on a consistent basis, they had come up short against the bigger sides. They failed against sides that had mastered a style and had more experience on that level that Pellegrini’s men.

Not just in this, but the pattern is also evident in the winners of the Champions League.

Before Zinedine Zidane came in at Real Madrid, the club always had managers who preferred to play a pragmatic brand of football. They had players who had been playing in the Champions League for a considerable amount of time. The Frenchman only nourished the style by keeping the same set of players around every season.

Real hardly made any big-name signings during this period as the likes of Cristiano Ronaldo, Marcelo, Toni Kroos, Luka Modric, Sergio Ramos, Raphael Varane and the likes being key figures in the three consecutive Champions League title wins. Nothing much changed all three years.

Their opponents all these years were Atletico Madrid (twice) and Juventus. And as previously mentioned, some things are very common between them. Those factors laid the foundation for them going far in the competition.

Before the Los Blancos won the title thrice, Barcelona had beaten (surprise, surprise) Juventus in the final. While the side that beat the Old Lady in Berlin wasn’t a rip off from the one that beat Man United in 2011, the spine of it was quite the same. Lionel Messi, Andres Iniesta, Javier Mascherano, Gerard Pique, and Sergio Busquets played big roles in that run to the title, just as they had done in the march to Wembley in 2011.

Agreed, money does play a role in the way teams emerge to be successful in Europe. But not all teams handle that money well. Perhaps, spending the right way has become an art form. Chelsea have spent over 450 million pounds over the last two seasons and they find themselves in the Europa League. Paris Saint-Germain signed Neymar from Barcelona and signed Kylian Mbappe from Monaco for record fees in their regards, but they have been knocked out of the Champions League in the Round of 16 twice since then.

Their failures in Europe are down to there not being enough managerial consistency in their approach to run clubs. Both PSG and Chelsea are clubs that favor the shortcuts to success; they don’t believe in long-term building. They sack managers at will and don’t let the long-term thrive.

The Blues did win the Champions League in 2012 under Roberto di Matteo and it was the culmination of years of having played a pragmatic brand of football when Andre Villas-Boas was looking to try something new and different. They won the title in the most back-to-the-wall way as possible.

That’s where Tottenham present a pleasing exception. For them, not having to change the side too much over the last many months has been an advantage. And keeping Pochettino at the helm has been an even bigger advantage. The players have improved. From being some of the best in the Premier League, the players have become some of the best in the world.

Unlike the other big clubs in England, the Lilywhites don’t rely on money. They have relied on stability in every department. And it proves what goes a long way in determining fates of clubs in the Champions League.

It hardly seems like a surprise now that four English sides find themselves in the last eight of the gilded competition. It will not be a surprise to see one of them too. More so, it won’t be a surprise to the same four be in the last eight again next season.

By: Kaustubh Pandey

Tags:
Advertisement
Advertisement
Fetching more content...