5 reasons Brock Lesnar should lose the WWE Universal Championship

Image result for brock lesnar sportskeeda
Brock Lesnar defeated Roman Reigns at WrestleMania 34

#3 He's a part-timer

Ad
Les
Lesnar occasionally appears on Raw

A number of Superstars down the years have worked a part-time schedule, but hardly any of them held WWE's top title. A part time athlete should primarily work as an enhancement talent for other talents and not to constantly dominate those he comes up against.

Ad

In a period where WWE needs to produce talent, having Lesnar go around crushing all his opponents makes little sense, especially when it is on a part-time basis.

WWE's huge mistake with John Cena revealed - Watch Here!

With a potential UFC match rumored to be in the pipeline, The Beast will have to devote most of his time to train for the bout. To have the Universal Title on him at such a time isn't the most sensible decision.

Whilst Lesnar is clearly a valuable asset for the WWE, he won't be with the company in the long run and therefore should not be a long term WWE Champion. Lesnar is already established and could be better used working in non-title singles matches.

Paul Heyman's downfall need to be studied - Check!

Quick Links

Edited by Nikhil Bhaskar
sk promotional banner
Sportskeeda logo
Close menu
WWE
WWE
NBA
NBA
NFL
NFL
MMA
MMA
Tennis
Tennis
NHL
NHL
Golf
Golf
MLB
MLB
Soccer
Soccer
F1
F1
WNBA
WNBA
down arrow icon
More
bell-icon Manage notifications