5 WWE Superstars who should've lost huge matches, but didn't

Cena toppled the Eater of Worlds in a match many thought the 16-time World Champion didn't need to win.
Cena toppled the Eater of Worlds in a match many thought the 16-time World Champion didn't need to win.

#1 Triple H reigns over RAW

Ad
Many believe it would have made more sense for Booker to have won in 2003.
Many believe it would have made more sense for Booker to have won in 2003

When Triple H regained the World Heavyweight Championship at Armageddon 2002, few could've predicted how long his title reign would be.

Ad

Ruling over RAW with the help of Evolution, The Game dominated everyone, but there were plenty of opportunities for the title to change hands.

These WWE segments are not for kids - Watch here 😏

Look at his match against Booker T at WrestleMania 19. A feud that made reference to Booker's criminal past, and also implied racial tensions between the pair, having the former WCW star win would've been a feel-good moment.

Instead, The Game pedigreed The Bookman, and pinned him nearly a minute after.

A huge loss, it would take Booker a King of the Ring win, several heel and face turns, and a whopping three years before he won the very same title in 2006 that many felt should've been his in 2003.

Big issue with Penta revealed HERE.

Quick Links

Edited by Atharva Papnoi
sk promotional banner
Sportskeeda logo
Close menu
WWE
WWE
NBA
NBA
NFL
NFL
MMA
MMA
Tennis
Tennis
NHL
NHL
Golf
Golf
MLB
MLB
Soccer
Soccer
F1
F1
WNBA
WNBA
More
More
bell-icon Manage notifications