3 reasons why Brock Lesnar should have dethroned Roman Reigns at Crown Jewel & 2 he shouldn't have

#2. Shouldn't have: Roman Reigns deserved to retain the title over Brock Lesnar

Although Roman Reigns' Universal title length is still shorter than Brock Lesnar's, that doesn't mean the quality has been the same. Brock Lesnar's entire run with the title was as a part-timer, and WWE often had to find ways to work around not having the main world title on RAW all the time.

It should be noted that it was nearly a 1-and-a-half year reign, and the last few months were exclusively used to feud with Roman Reigns. On the other hand, Roman Reigns has been a full-time dominant champion.

Although most weeks of SmackDown start and end with him, the character development has been incredible.

We argued that there's only one credible name to dethrone Roman Reigns. But if things are working, why try to change them? This is a different kind of lengthy and dominant reign, and it's the best of Roman Reigns' career. This was only Brock Lesnar's first match in 19 months, and Roman Reigns deserved to retain the Universal title more than Brock Lesnar deserved to win.