WWE Money in the Bank: 5 reasons why Brock Lesnar should not have won the Ladder Match

Mr. Money in the Bank
Mr. Money in the Bank

#2 Enough with part-timers

Ad
Lesnar is a part-timer
Lesnar is a part-timer

The entire scenario with Lesnar prior to WrestleMania was that he is a part-timer and the WWE Universe wanted someone who could defend the Universal Title on a regular basis.

Ad

When Seth Rollins won his bout against the Beast at WrestleMania, the fans got just what they wanted. But now, Lesnar can once again win a major title and then not defend it on a weekly basis.

15 shocking wrestling couples - Find out now!

This would bring the whole scenario back to square one. Also, even if Lesnar doesn't cash in his MITB contract prior or during the Super ShowDown, we would still be a part-timer holding the MITB contract.

As a result, the weekly suspense of expecting/hoping the MITB holder to cash in will not be enjoyed by the fans and they could almost certainly know that the only time the Beast would cash in would be during a major PPV.

Goldberg ruined Bray Wyatt's career? - Watch now!

Quick Links

Edited by Raunak J
sk promotional banner
Sportskeeda logo
Close menu
WWE
WWE
NBA
NBA
NFL
NFL
MMA
MMA
Tennis
Tennis
NHL
NHL
Golf
Golf
MLB
MLB
Soccer
Soccer
F1
F1
WNBA
WNBA
More
More
bell-icon Manage notifications