Pros and cons of Virat Kohli and Anil Kumble's 'horses for courses' theory

CRICKET-WIS-IND-PRACTICE : News Photo
Kohli and Kumble’s approach has reaped rewards for Team India

Con: Loss of stability

KOLKATA, WEST BENGAL - APRIL 03:  Ben Stokes of England is consoled by Liam Plunkett after losing the ICC World Twenty20 India 2016 Final between England and the West Indies at Eden Gardens on April 3, 2016 in Kolkata, India.  (Photo by Gareth Copley/Getty Images)
Players being constantly brought in or thrown out can have a disastrous effect on team stability

Clarity and effective communication can only take you to a certain point. Sometimes it hurts to have a capricious line-up, especially because players are not allowed to settle into roles comfortable for them.

While each player or team is known to experiment from time to time, one of the reasons why the Australian golden era was indeed golden was because all the players had well-defined roles. Michael Bevan wasn’t expected to open the innings, and no one batted an eye if Matthew Hayden got out cheaply in an attempt to dominate the bowling opposition.

The stability in team composition and tactics brings a sense of confidence to every player’s approach. If a player is brought in for specific matches, at times he may find a need to play a certain way, which might be detrimental to the momentum of the match, just to solidify his place in the playing eleven.

Brand-new app in a brand-new avatar! Download CricRocket for fast cricket scores, rocket flicks, super notifications and much more! 🚀☄️

Quick Links