Money in the Bank 2019: 5 Mistakes that WWE cannot make at Money in the Bank

If WWE wants to rectify its ratings woes, several things cannot happen at Money in the Bank.
If WWE wants to rectify its ratings woes, several things cannot happen at Money in the Bank.

#4 A former winner wins a second briefcase

Orton cashed his briefcase in on Daniel Bryan back in 2013.
Orton cashed his briefcase in on Daniel Bryan back in 2013.

One of the biggest mistakes that can be made in any Money in the Bank ladder match is having a former winner claim another briefcase. If the same people are always featured in the title scene and nothing new changes, it becomes boring and stagnant.

Since there are two ladder matches, there are two potential chances for WWE to pick the wrong winners. While I don't think either match will be won by someone who has already claimed a briefcase in the past, I wouldn't put it past the WWE to have Randy Orton or Baron Corbin win another briefcase.

Both Orton and Corbin are heels and both top champions are faces. That would suggest that whomever wins the ladder match for the men will likely be heels. Corbin is loathed by the fans and it's not because he's a fantastic heel. He's just not exciting in the veins of someone like Kevin Owens, Sami Zayn or even heel CM Punk.

And Randy Orton is representative of the older generation in the company. If he's booked to win again, it will stamp out any chance of someone new and exciting getting an opportunity. I think if someone like Finn Balor, Ricochet or Andrade won it would be exponentially more exciting and better for WWE than if Orton or Corbin won again.

What makes Sting special? His first AEW opponent opens up RIGHT HERE.