Lights! Camera! Action! - A list of improvements for cricket broadcasting

SYDNEY, AUSTRALIA - JANUARY 04:  Former Australian cricketer and current commentator Ian Healy poses with 'The Richies' a group of supporters dressed up as former Australian cricket captain and commentator Richie Benaud sing during day two of the Third Test match between Australia and Pakistan at Sydney Cricket Ground on January 4, 2017 in Sydney, Australia.  (Photo by Mark Kolbe/Getty Images)
Richie Benaud represented cricket broadcasting done right. He stands in this picture (R) with his fans, “The Richies” 

More journalists as commentators

NOTTINGHAM, ENGLAND - JULY 12:  Star Sports commentators Harsha Bhogle, Rahul Dravid and Sourav Ganguly ahead of day four of 1st Investec Test match between England and India at Trent Bridge on July 12, 2014 in Nottingham, England.  (Photo by Gareth Copley/Getty Images)
Harsha Bhogle (L) is one of the few Indians to make it into commentary without playing any top-tier cricket

Cricket commentary, particularly in India, has reached new lows in recent times. Not only have the BCCI censored all commentary, with the threat of exile, the quality of the content itself is usually very poor.

With respect to classic cricket commentary, one usually thinks of Richie Benaud, Tony Cozier, and Harsha Bhogle. The gravitas with which they brought the game to life was unparalleled. They knew how to make a boring passage of play interesting with valid stories and how to do justice to a thrilling contest without screaming into a microphone.

Those days are gone. Nowadays, commentary, with a few exceptions, is completely overrun by ex-players, all of whom have either a political directive (in the case of Ravi Shastri and Sunil Gavaskar, who are directly hired as BCCI spokesmen), or are inexperienced in the role and have too many ties in current world cricket to be objective third eyes, like Michael Clarke.

Often, commentators are simply not well trained, not knowledgeable enough and engage in tired and awkward chit-chat that is either extremely partisan, vague or simply irrelevant. Commentary nowadays targets the stupid fan, spelling out what has just happened, talking in fear of silence.

Commentary desperately needs an injection of professional journalists, podcasters, analysts or even presenters like Mark Howard, who stimulate interesting conversation. Having former players does enhance things by way of interesting cricket stories and expert analysis, but the players need to be fluent in the language they are commentating in, well-trained and experienced, without having conflicts of interest. Ian Chappel, Richie Benaud and Ian Bishop are notable examples of this.

Essentially, a balance must be reached. The three-person commentary team can contain one or two experts, who are ex-players, but it must also have a minimum of one career journalist, historian or presenter, to give cricket broadcasting the class it deserves.

Click here to get India Squad for T20 World Cup 2024. Follow Sportskeeda for the T20 World Cup Schedule, Points Table, and news

Quick Links