Shortcomings of the system
As with any football philosophy, the ‘false nine’ is not foolproof; there are different ways to neutralise the effectiveness of the system.
Its success depends on drawing away defenders since they cannot mark one or two strikers in the central position.
However, if the defenders stay put and organised (more commonly known in football fan circles as ‘parking the bus’) or employ zonal instead of man-marking without following their man, it can disrupt the style of play with teams simply keeping possession without being incisive.
Also read: Tactical systems explained: 4-2-3-1
Also, in a team that cannot effectively implement the ideology, the false nine can backfire with opponents launching quick counter-attacks.
A case in point could be Liverpool’s only loss this season so far to Burnley at the Turf Moor, where despite having the majority of the possession, they couldn’t score but were left susceptible at the back due to their high pressing line.
Conventional strikers may also prove to be more clinical – after all, their job is to score goals irrespective of obstacles. Lack of game time in sides that employ the system can leave their strikers disgruntled (honourable mentions: Daniel Sturridge (Liverpool), Olivier Giroud (Arsenal)).
