Gwyneth Paltrow took the stand to testify in her ongoing ski collision trial on March 24. Plaintiff Terry Sanderson sued Paltrow for $3.1 million in 2019, claiming she collided with him on a ski slope at the Deer Valley Resort in Park City, Utah, in 2016 and the accident caused him to have a permanent traumatic brain injury.Paltrow countersued Sanderson, claiming that the latter crashed into her instead. The actress charged him $1 in damages and sought the repayment of her legal fees. On Friday, March 24, Sanderson’s lawyer Kristin Vanorman made the news for grilling Paltrow during her testimony.Court TV@CourtTV"He struck me in the back, yes. That's exactly what happened." #GwynethPaltrow grilled over her account of the ski crash with Terry Sanderson. What do YOU think? ⚖️#CourtTV18523"He struck me in the back, yes. That's exactly what happened." #GwynethPaltrow grilled over her account of the ski crash with Terry Sanderson. What do YOU think? ⚖️#CourtTV https://t.co/9upN7dEkS4The key point of the testimony centered on Paltrow denying colliding into Sanderson and saying that the latter struck her on the ski slope instead. Vanorman spent nearly an hour questioning the actress about the events leading up to the ski accident and about her knowledge of ski rules.Vanorman asked Paltrow if the latter knew about the rules of exchanging contact information following a skiing collision. When Paltrow replied that she felt Sanderson was at fault and that her ski instructor said she would give Sanderson her info, the attorney pressed:“I appreciate that, but my question was, did you know of the rule of skiing that if you are in a collision that you need to share that information?”The lawyer also reminded Gwyneth Paltrow that Sanderson’s ski buddy Greg Ramone witnessed the incident and previously accused the Marvel star of crashing into the plaintiff. The latter said:“I don't believe that he saw what he thinks he saw.”However, Vanorman countered by saying:“Ms. Paltrow, why would he lie?"When Paltrow commented on Ramone's color-blindness and significant distance from the site of the incident, Vanorman said:“And I'm sure that's what you believe.”However, Gwyneth Paltrow went on to mention that it was the “truth.”Law&Crime Network@LawCrimeNetworkWhile on the stand being questioned by one of #TerrySanderson's attorney, Actress @GwynethPaltrow asserted that she did not believe an eyewitness' testimony of his version of the ski collision because he is color blind.284While on the stand being questioned by one of #TerrySanderson's attorney, Actress @GwynethPaltrow asserted that she did not believe an eyewitness' testimony of his version of the ski collision because he is color blind. https://t.co/QzqEAwLJAwKristin Vanorman also questioned Gwyneth Paltrow about her children’s presence on the ski slopes and repeatedly asked if they said:“Mommy, Mommy, watch me!”The actress replied that she did not recall her children calling for attention and said that she would not engage in reckless behavior with or without her kids.Vanorman went on to question Paltrow about her relationship with Taylor Swift and asked if her $1 countersuit was inspired by Swift’s 2017 case against radio DJ David Mueller.“Are you good friends with Taylor Swift?”The actress denied the claim and mentioned:“I would not say we’re good friends. We are friendly. I’ve taken my kids to one of her concerts before, but we don’t talk very often.”The lawyer even asked Gwyneth Paltrow about sending “intimate gifts” to Swift for Christmas before the judge said that the actress could choose not to answer the question.At one point in the trial, Gwyneth Paltrow’s was shocked after Kristin Vanorman said that the former “lied under oath a number of times” during her depositions. When Paltrow’s lawyer called the claim “slanderous,” Vanorman changed her words to “prior inconsistent statements.”Paltrow’s legal team is yet to address any witnesses to the stand. However, multiple reports have suggested that her children Apple and Moses Martin, as well as her husband Brad Falchuk, are likely to testify in the trial.Everything to know about Kristin VanormanKristin Vanorman is an attorney and partner of Strong and Hanni law firm in Salt Lake City, Utah. According to her official bio, she graduated cum laude from the Reuben J. Clark Law School at Brigham Young University and has been practicing law for over 25 years.The lawyer has reportedly tried and arbitrated hundreds of cases in state and federal courts. She specializes on “labor and employment law, government liability and transportation.”The online profile states that Vanorman has covered employment laws, harassment, investigations, and employment training during her practice. She also has significant experience in transportation cases including personal injury, brain injury, wrongful death and premises liability, among others.Vanorman is a member of DRI and UDLA and serves as the Utah State Chair of the Council on Litigation Management. She is also the Utah representative for the American Board of Trial Advocates and has been named a member of Utah’s Legal Elite.Netizens reacts to Kristin Vanorman grilling Gwyneth Paltrow during ski collision trialKristin Vanorman and Gwyneth Paltrow's session during ski collision trial went viral online (Image via Getty Images)Optometrist Terry Sanderson’s lawyer Kristin Vanorman recently went viral online after grilling Gwyneth Paltrow as she took the stands to testify in the ski collision trial involving a 2016 ski accident in Utah’s Deer Valley Resort.Several social media users also took to Twitter to share moments of Vanorman’s interaction with Paltrow during the testimony.Amanda Kennerly@MandyintheWestWhat is the name of the attorney questioning her? I'm frustrated I can't find it, but she is getting to the crux of it despite the attempts of #GwynethPaltrow 's weasel lawyer to hide the facts. In my practice it was never wrong to ask the witness to reenact what happened. twitter.com/CourtTV/status…Court TV@CourtTV#BREAKING: Oscar winner and #Goop CEO Gwyneth Paltrow takes the stand in her ski crash trial.WATCH #CourtTV NOW | youtube.com/live/lfoLXDzvi…16521#BREAKING: Oscar winner and #Goop CEO Gwyneth Paltrow takes the stand in her ski crash trial.WATCH #CourtTV NOW | youtube.com/live/lfoLXDzvi… https://t.co/POwYckkE0WWhat is the name of the attorney questioning her? I'm frustrated I can't find it, but she is getting to the crux of it despite the attempts of #GwynethPaltrow 's weasel lawyer to hide the facts. In my practice it was never wrong to ask the witness to reenact what happened. twitter.com/CourtTV/status…Briella@Briella94880882⁦@VinniePolitan⁩ ⁦@CourtTV⁩ I loved Ms. Kristin. (She wasn’t nervous, lol, playing Crescendo). strongandhanni.com/attorneys/atto…⁦@VinniePolitan⁩ ⁦@CourtTV⁩ I loved Ms. Kristin. (She wasn’t nervous, lol, playing Crescendo). strongandhanni.com/attorneys/atto…Mohamad El Chamaa@MohamdEchGwyneth Paltrow getting grilled about Taylor Swift 1Gwyneth Paltrow getting grilled about Taylor Swift 😅 https://t.co/nD2Uyrka7Aʙʀᴇᴛᴛ ᴄᴏᴏᴘᴇʀ@wasillawarlockWow. Gwyneth Paltrow is getting GRILLED. But it's only $300k she's being sued for and the guy has a valid case. Considering the coin she makes, if it were me, I'd just cut him a check for it and settle out of court and be done.Wow. Gwyneth Paltrow is getting GRILLED. But it's only $300k she's being sued for and the guy has a valid case. Considering the coin she makes, if it were me, I'd just cut him a check for it and settle out of court and be done.vbspurs@vbspursHoly crap. Are you guys watching this trainwreck? Gwyneth Paltrow is being grilled on the stand.101Holy crap. Are you guys watching this trainwreck? Gwyneth Paltrow is being grilled on the stand.Law&Crime Network@LawCrimeNetwork#TerrySanderson's lawyer, Kristin Van Orman, pressed @GwynethPaltrow about her $1 countersuit against the plaintiff. "You're not just asking for a dollar," Van Orman said. "You're asking for your attorney's fees too, is that right?"547#TerrySanderson's lawyer, Kristin Van Orman, pressed @GwynethPaltrow about her $1 countersuit against the plaintiff. "You're not just asking for a dollar," Van Orman said. "You're asking for your attorney's fees too, is that right?" https://t.co/bErkve9f5zThe Resistor Sister®️♥️🇺🇸@the_resistor@LawCrimeNetwork @GwynethPaltrow Gwyneth literally looking down her nose at Kristen Van Orman and acting “as if” she’s ONLY asking “for $1 for myself” and neglecting to mention her attorney’s fees is DISINGENUOUS in the Extreme8@LawCrimeNetwork @GwynethPaltrow Gwyneth literally looking down her nose at Kristen Van Orman and acting “as if” she’s ONLY asking “for $1 for myself” and neglecting to mention her attorney’s fees is DISINGENUOUS in the ExtremeAngenette Levy@Angenette5Gwyneth Paltrow says she is saying Sanderson hit her. The plaintiff's lawyer says "I'm sure you believe that." Gwyneth says "I believe it because it's true." @LawCrimeNetwork805Gwyneth Paltrow says she is saying Sanderson hit her. The plaintiff's lawyer says "I'm sure you believe that." Gwyneth says "I believe it because it's true." @LawCrimeNetworkAmanda Kennerly@MandyintheWest#KristinVanOrman is hitting it, I can just picture that witch screaming obscenities at an old man lying on the snow that her 170lb 5'10" body in ski clothes just crushed. And if she can afford $9000 ski trips and massages, why not a haircut? #gwynethpaltrowskicrashcase3#KristinVanOrman is hitting it, I can just picture that witch screaming obscenities at an old man lying on the snow that her 170lb 5'10" body in ski clothes just crushed. And if she can afford $9000 ski trips and massages, why not a haircut? #gwynethpaltrowskicrashcase https://t.co/Q2YYptSjwuThe Recount@therecountPlaintiff’s lawyer: “May I ask how tall you are?”Gwyneth Paltrow: “I’m just under 5'10.”Lawyer: “I am so jealous.”Paltrow: “I think I’m shrinking though.”Lawyer: “I have to wear 4-inch heels just to make it to 5'5.”Paltrow: “Well, they’re very nice.”30639Plaintiff’s lawyer: “May I ask how tall you are?”Gwyneth Paltrow: “I’m just under 5'10.”Lawyer: “I am so jealous.”Paltrow: “I think I’m shrinking though.”Lawyer: “I have to wear 4-inch heels just to make it to 5'5.”Paltrow: “Well, they’re very nice.” https://t.co/nB2kc503AcJosh Breslow@JoshBreslowTVWATCH: Plaintiff's lawyer acts out ski crash involving Gwyneth Paltrow, while actress is on the stand. #GwynethPaltrow #GwynethPaltrowtrial @livenowfox61WATCH: Plaintiff's lawyer acts out ski crash involving Gwyneth Paltrow, while actress is on the stand. #GwynethPaltrow #GwynethPaltrowtrial @livenowfox https://t.co/qr8k2RRa4pHowever, some users also criticized Kristin Vanorman and her antics in the courtroom:Julie Grant@JulieCourtTVIMO⚖️ #GwynethPaltrow’s testimony was enhanced by the weak lawyering on the plaintiff’s side! The Q’s were awkward & ineffective. Went over like a lead balloon! #PaltrowTrial @CourtTV12210IMO☝️⚖️ #GwynethPaltrow’s testimony was enhanced by the weak lawyering on the plaintiff’s side! 👀 The Q’s were awkward & ineffective. Went over like a lead balloon! #PaltrowTrial @CourtTV https://t.co/93ToEsafylFrank Smeraglinolo@franksmerg@JulieCourtTV @CourtTV Even a non-attorney like me could see the mistakes. She was too easy and too kind. Control the witness and don't joke around with the witness. And most of all NEVER ACCUSE THE WITNESS OF PERJURY WHILE ARGUING OBJECTION WITH THE JUDGE ‍⚖️.7@JulieCourtTV @CourtTV Even a non-attorney like me could see 👀 the mistakes. She was too easy and too kind. Control the witness and don't joke around with the witness. And most of all NEVER ACCUSE THE WITNESS OF PERJURY WHILE ARGUING OBJECTION WITH THE JUDGE 👨‍⚖️.Susan G 🏴‍☠️🦙🎸@baywriter@the_resistor @LawCrimeNetwork @GwynethPaltrow It’s this lawyer who is disingenuous…it’s common practice to ask for attorney fees and she’s acting so offended. It’s also the judge who decides if that’s appropriate. GP doesn’t shy away from this issue.1@the_resistor @LawCrimeNetwork @GwynethPaltrow It’s this lawyer who is disingenuous…it’s common practice to ask for attorney fees and she’s acting so offended. It’s also the judge who decides if that’s appropriate. GP doesn’t shy away from this issue.Mike@coach781096@LawCrimeNetwork @GwynethPaltrow This lawyer is ridiculous seriously. Let me ask a question if I’m driving and I get rear ended I’m not at fault. So why is she? She got ran into. Even if she was watching the kid the people behind her should keep their distance4@LawCrimeNetwork @GwynethPaltrow This lawyer is ridiculous seriously. Let me ask a question if I’m driving and I get rear ended I’m not at fault. So why is she? She got ran into. Even if she was watching the kid the people behind her should keep their distanceLV@LVlovely@LawCrimeNetwork @GwynethPaltrow This particular lawyer was like a dog trying to not let go of a bone. My goodness. I still have a headache from it.3@LawCrimeNetwork @GwynethPaltrow This particular lawyer was like a dog trying to not let go of a bone. My goodness. I still have a headache from it.Michelle Schnake@O2MOM@LawCrimeNetwork @GwynethPaltrow That lawyer was ridiculous and fan girling. It was embarrassing.5@LawCrimeNetwork @GwynethPaltrow That lawyer was ridiculous and fan girling. It was embarrassing.Dancer Jayne@nougat_c@LawCrimeNetwork @GwynethPaltrow #KristinVanOrman is a terrible lawyer.Her line of Qs was totally bizarre.If Gwyneth wasn't being reckless & was hit from behind by #TerrySanderson it's his fault plain & simple. Nothing else matters.She also insulted Gwyneth abt her age. So unprofessional.#GwynethPaltrowtrial@LawCrimeNetwork @GwynethPaltrow #KristinVanOrman is a terrible lawyer.Her line of Qs was totally bizarre.If Gwyneth wasn't being reckless & was hit from behind by #TerrySanderson it's his fault plain & simple. Nothing else matters.She also insulted Gwyneth abt her age. So unprofessional.#GwynethPaltrowtrialAs Friday's proceedings came to an end, Terry Sanderson's lawyers mentioned that they would likely have the plaintiff testify on the stand on Monday before resting their case.