5 things SmackDown Live Does Better Than RAW
RAW is too long and crammed with filler. SmackDown Live uses its time wisely. These are 5 things SmackDown Live does better than RAW.
WWE has been making the new brand extension seem like it’s a weekly life-and-death situation for the GMs and Commissioners. Both shows are trying to prove supremacy, but both of them have reasons why one is better than the other.
Here are 5 things that SmackDown Live does better than RAW:
#5 Title Feuds
While RAW may have a larger field of challengers for many of its titles, SmackDown has the advantage in terms of actual feuds for their belts. The Women’s titles are pretty equal, with Charlotte vs. Sasha and Becky vs. Bliss being simple, concise feuds without a lot of silly crap getting in the way.
Also read: 5 things RAW does better than Smackdown Live
The Intercontinental Title feud over the past few months between Dolph Ziggler and The Miz has been great. Part of why it’s great is the way they have changed it up. It went from Miz vs. Ziggler to Miz vs. Ziggler with Ziggler’s career on the line, to Miz and the Spirit Squad vs. Ziggler. It evolved.
RAW has Roman Reigns assaulting women with cake and convoluted, boring storylines that involve worthless Hell in a Cell matches.