#1 It Shouldn't Have Been Ambrose

The main takeaway from Raw this week was Drew McIntyre absolutely destroying both Roman Reigns and Dean Ambrose in a brutal display. One could only describe the assault McIntyre inflicted on both these men as a character building moment for the heel, as it is clear after the events of Raw, WWE has all the intentions in the world to pit Roman Reigns against Drew at WrestleMania.
While that is an exciting prospect, it seems like it might be a mistake and a wasted opportunity from the creative team, as McIntyre being Reigns opponent either means one of two things, the first option is McIntyre beating a returning Reigns, and the second is Reigns defeating a highly protected Drew.
Look who just shut down all of Tony Khan's critics! More HERE.
Most people would go for the latter as there is little evidence to support a McIntyre win, as WWE won't let Reigns lose his comeback WrestleMania match, especially after the support he has gained as a babyface from the crowd.
So does this mean McIntyre will be buried? Well, 'buried' is a strong word, as he is a huge star right now that can bounce back from a loss, but it will dent his credibility. So this leads to the question of who should have been Reigns' WrestleMania opponent? Well, it should have been no one else but Dean Ambrose.
Now Ambrose flip-flopping from heel to face then back to heel is never good for long term credibility building, but if there is one feud that could light Raw on fire now, it would be Ambrose vs Reigns.