Ranking each WWE Championship's current spot on the main roster

Which titles are treated like the gold that represent them and which aren't?
Which titles are treated like the gold that represent them and which aren't?

#7 Raw Tag Team Titles

The Top Guys may have become champions to keep them happy after asking for their release.
The Top Guys may have become champions to keep them happy after asking for their release.

Current Champions/Former Champions: The Revival/Bobby Roode and Chad Gable

How long they will hold the titles: Until WWE finds the next flavor of the week, possibly 'Mania

The supposed flagship show's titles aren't treated like they should be. If Raw is the top show, then the tag team titles should be treated as such. But they haven't been.

The division has been a mix of singles wrestlers as champions (Ambrose and Rollins, McIntyre and Ziggler, Roode and Gable) as well teams that have faced start-stop pushes to their momentum (Deleters of Worlds, Authors of Pain).

As happy as I am that The Revival currently hold the titles, the reason behind why they do is not a good sign.

Simply putting titles on unhappy talent might keep them around, but it doesn't set a good precedent for how you deal with your superstars.

WWE sort of booked themselves into the situation with The Revival, especially with those awful matches with the Lucha House Party.

The Revival is a throwback team to the likes of the Midnight Express and the Brain Busters, but they were booked like jokes.

While they are currently the champions and booked seriously, how long will that last? Will they only be placeholders until a new, more exciting team is penned to be champs?

Quick Links