WWE Survivor Series 2020: 5 Booking Decisions that should have been different 

There are several decisions that WWE could have done differently at Survivor Series
There are several decisions that WWE could have done differently at Survivor Series

#2. The WWE women's match came across as a bit of a mess

Ad

youtube-cover
Ad

The Women's Elimination match was easily one of the low points of the card since the match was stacked with botches. At Survivor Series, more often than not, there is always a moment when there are too many people in the ring and it causes some issues. Last year when 15 superstars were featured WWE definitely had more problems, but this year had a fair few as well.

Look who just shut down all of Tony Khan's critics! More HERE.

Peyton Royce had one of the most interesting botches of the night after she had already pinned Bayley. It's strange since Royce wasn't even supposed to be part of the match originally and hasn't done anything on RAW since the Draft. Bayley is one of SmackDown's biggest stars and was the first woman eliminated.

Ad

Baszler was also made to look stupid when she was disqualified for not breaking the hold on Bianca Belair, which is somewhat confusing since Baszler is WWE's Submission Magician, so she should know the rules and that she has to break on a five count.

Nia Jax also no-sold several moves, even when they were delivered by Bianca Belair which was noted by a number of fans, before the countout. The only point of the match that made sense storywise was Lana's victory.

Quick Links

Edited by James Sullivan
sk promotional banner
Sportskeeda logo
Close menu
WWE
WWE
NBA
NBA
NFL
NFL
MMA
MMA
Tennis
Tennis
NHL
NHL
Golf
Golf
MLB
MLB
Soccer
Soccer
F1
F1
WNBA
WNBA
More
More
bell-icon Manage notifications