Tottenham Hotspur 1-1 Chelsea: Tactical analysis of a game of two halves

TRP

Gylfi Sigurdsson

The battle between two of the more tactically astute managers was expected to be a cagey affair in midfield and to be decided by reactive substitutions by both the managers, but the final score-line of 1-1 doesn’t reflect perfectly on the high tempo game at White Hart Lane.

Ramires’s late inclusion was the only surprise in the team-sheets as much of the pre-match hype was about the battle between No.10s Erikson and Oscar, the latter’s inclusion ahead of Mata again bringing grunts from the Chelsea fans.

Though both teams were playing in the same shape of 4-2-3-1, there was a vast difference in the manner of attacks of both teams.

Tottenham were the much brighter of the two sides in the first half, and much of their attacks were centered on Eriksen. Right from the start, Spurs pressed with the 2 men upfront: Soldado and Eriksen.

But rather than pressurizing the at times erroneous Mikel in midfield, the Spurs duo was more intent on closing down the space for Luiz and Terry to launch upfront. This resulted in Mikel and Lampard receiving the ball in loads of space, and though Paulinho’s energetic runs through the middle caused Mikel a few problems, Lampard was more or else allowed to distribute easily due to Dembele staying deep in his half.

It was Paulinho who was causing Chelsea’s midfield all the problems, as the Brazilain box to box player has added a highly dynamic look to AVB’s team.

With Tottenham’s defenders and Dembele doing an apt job in the distribution to fullbacks, Paulinho was able to make all the attacking runs forward and link with Townsend and Sigurdsson. Again, it was Mikel who was responsible to cover the Brazilian, but the Chelsea man let him come into the box unmarked on a number of occasions.

The other dimension of Spurs’ attack was the contrasting style of wing play in the team. Neither of the two wingers, Townsend or Sigurdsson, nor the fullbacks Walker and Naughton, were able to attempt a single cross into the box.

Rather, Townsend on the right was encouraged to attack Cole and cut onto his left foot repeatedly. While that has been the feature of the young Englishman’s game so far, it was Gylfi Sigurdsson’s style on the right which proved fruitful.

With Ramires playing high up on the right, Gylfi had to provide ample support to the makeshift left back, Naughton against a marauding Ivanovic.

But while Spurs were on the ball, rather than running down the fullback, Gylfi drifted into the centre to allow Eriksen space to operate. In fact, Gylfi’s deep positioning on the left wing often pulled out Ivanovic to mark him, and again similar to the Norwich game, the Icelandic midfielder was able to rush past the now pulled out right back to finish off the good work done by Eriksen and Soldado.

Though the feature of the move was Eriksen between the lines picking out Soldado with a ball that deliberately was played a bit behind the striker, but Gylfi’s tactic is exactly how a solid right back can be disposed by an unorthodox winger.

Chelsea’s first half was rather subdued and spent more in damage control. Oscar was again seen covering large distances and coming up with key tackles, but his final ball to either Torres or Ramires was lacking the bite. Hazard looked the liveliest Blue in the first half, but Walker’s surprisingly stubborn show and Townsend’s fantastic runs on the same flank saw the Belgian much more ineffective than usual.

Jose’s call to bring out Mata at the start of the second half brought out jeers that the ‘Special One’ had finally swallowed his pride. But from Spurs’ display in the first half, Mourinho’s call regarding Mata seemed a tactic to strengthen the defensive marking in certain positions rather than the need for creativity.

Townsend’s runs needed to be tamed on the left and at the same time, Hazard needed to be brought into the game. So Jose moved his most disciplined attacker Oscar away from the preferred No.10 into a role in front of Cole on the left.

Also, Mikel’s inability to deal with the onrushing Paulinho, in fact pretty much a big match syndrome with the Nigerian, made Jose push Ramires to the centre instead. This change saw Mata start on the right with Hazard now through the centre.

Most of Chelsea’ spark in the second half was provided by an inspired Torres upfront, whose second half performance might be one of his best in a Blue shirt.

Torres’s style alongside a fluid Chelsea midfield sees him run the channels between the centre backs and fullbacks on most occasions. The Spaniard followed this pattern in the first half, and contrastingly, his compatriot Soldado on the other end operated in between the Chelsea CBs, which allowed Eriksen to pick out better through balls.

But with Oscar pushing to a wide left position, Hazard a much less energetic presence in the second half and with Mata operating at the halfway line to open up spaces on the flanks, Torres was now left with the entire last quarter of the pitch to dribble and run at the Spurs defence.

He successfully did so on 2-3 occasions against Dawson and Vertonghen, and a stupid sending off by the referee resulted in an inspired performance ending prematurely.

Oscar’s presence on the left saw Townsend getting much lesser time and space to run at Cole. This led to AVB bringing on Nacer Chadli on that flank, whose towering physique would have been perfectly suited to ward off Oscar.

Apart from the Belgian Chadli’s arrival on the left, Oscar found himself in good crossing positions on a couple of times when even cutting in would have been a good option.

But Oscar’s defensive stint left him unable to take advantage of these. So Mourinho brought in Andre Schurrle on the left, who is much more accomplished than Oscar in cutting inside from the left.

Despite starting on the right, Juan Mata settled into a No.10 role after Hazard’s departure, and in typical fashion, the Spaniard was able to pick out perfect through balls upfront.

Apart from his set piece where Terry scored, another chance went begging when Schurrle’s attempt was well saved by Lloris. In fact, Tottenham’s keeper Lloris has been really impressive in the early part of this season.

His tactic of coming a long way off his line to pick up through balls behind the defence, and his superb dealing of set-pieces against a physical team like Chelsea, has seen Spurs being the 2nd most miserly team in Europe.

All in all, it was a game of 2 halves and 2 major tactics by the managers. AVB’s version of playing Paulinho in an attacking role against Mikel almost paid off major dividends, but his intent on playing Sigurdsson as a deep lying winger who rushes into the box, is now become a successfully established one for Spurs.

Mourinho on the other hand needs to be given credit to the way he controlled the energetic Spurs in the 2nd half. AVB himself pointed out Jose’s closing down tactic as the reason why the likes of Eriksen and Townsend couldn’t prosper in the second half.

Mata’s resurgence seems to be temporary however, as regardless of his creative display, the way the Spaniard allowed Dembele to ghost past him so many times in the second half, will definitely leave Jose demanding much more from Juan.

Quick Links

App download animated image Get the free App now